Indian police officers in Srinagar, Kashmir, in 2016 in the wake of protests over the killing of a local leader. [Source: nytimes.com]

The Biden administration has ratcheted up weapons supplies to India’s quasi-fascist government as part of a dangerous anti-China policy

In early February, the U.S. State Department approved nearly $4 billion in drone sales to India, adding to the $20 billion worth of U.S.-origin defense material the U.S. had sold to India since 2008.

State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said afterwards that “the U.S.-India defense partnership has seen significant growth over the past decade,” noting that the sale of 31 MQ-9B SkyGuardian aircraft made by General Atomics “offered significant potential to further advance strategic technology cooperation with India and military cooperation in the region.”

The Biden administration has sought to court India as part of its efforts to counter China in the Indo-Pacific region, while prying it away from Russia. Biden called the U.S.-India relationship “the defining partnership of the 21st century,” while Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that our countries’ ties are “shaping lives, dreams, and destinies.” 

Farhan M. Chak’s recent book, Nuclear Flashpoint: The War Over Kashmir (London: Pluto Press, 2024), shows that many of the lives and destinies are being shaped in horrific ways.

This is particularly true of the Muslim majority in Indian-occupied Kashmir, one of the most militarized spaces on the planet, which has become a nuclear flashpoint as Modi’s government intensifies tensions with Pakistan and China.

A book cover with white text

Description automatically generated
[Source: amazon.com]

Chak is a visiting faculty member at Georgetown University and Secretary General of Kashmir Civitas, an organization committed to the emancipation of Kashmir.

A person in a suit

Description automatically generated
Farhan M. Chak [Source: acmcu.georgetown.edu]

Several of his family members were killed in the 1947 genocide in Kashmir perpetrated by the Hindu Dogra family, which was installed by the British and would not cede power peacefully following the demise of the British Empire and the formation of the independent nations of India and Pakistan.

Kashmiri Muslims trace the beginning of their occupation to the 1846 Treaty of Amritsar signed between the British East India Company and Raja Gulab Singh, the chief of the Dogra family, in which all of Kashmir was sold for the paltry sum of 7.5 million rupees without the population’s consent.[1]

Raja Gulab Singh [Source: jammukashmirnow.com]

The Dogras were given military support by the British to sustain their rule over the Muslim Kashmiris whom they treated as slaves. In return, the Dogras promised the British overlords the cannon fodder their imperialistic endeavors required.

A painting of a person receiving a gift from a group of people

Description automatically generated
Painting depicting thef signing of 1846 Treaty of Amritsar. [Source: khalsaaffairs.com]

After the signing of the Treaty of Amritsar, the last indigenous sovereign ruler of Kashmir, Yusuf Shah Chak, a direct ancestor of Farhan M. Chak, was imprisoned and poisoned to death.[2]

Yusuf Shah Chak, the last native king of Kashmir. [Source: gyawun.com]

In early 1931, a rebellion erupted after a Hindu police officer was charged with desecrating the Holy Quran, forcing the British to send three companies of armed troops to support the suppression of the rebellion by the Dogra rulers.[3]

The violence served as a prelude to the 1947 genocide where Chak has estimated that between 237,000 and 500,000 Kashmiri Muslims were killed.[4] Afterwards, two new political entities—India and Pakistan—were created, with parts of Kashmir incorporated into both.

In October 1947, Kashmiris fought with Pakistani irregular forces in liberating Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan from the Dogra. When Dogra ruler Maharaja Hari Singh appealed to India for military support, they formed an alliance on the condition that Singh would yield the Muslim majority state of Kashmir to India, which has controlled much of them ever since.[5]

undefined
Maharaja Hari Singh, the last king of the ruling Dogra dynasty in Kashmir. [Source: en.wikipedia.org]

Kashmiris, however, do not see Indian control as legitimate because the Maharaja was an imposed ruler placed over Kashmir by British madate, not the indigenous people who were never consulted.

The Indian government’s entire narrative today in legitimating their rule in Kashmir rests on their armed intervention being a consequence of a “tribal invasion by Pakistan” that they supposedly defended India against.

However, Pakistanis were well within their rights to try to liberate the oppressed Muslim people of Kashmir, who had been subjected to genocide and have been heavily persecuted ever since.

Significantly, Indian troops who participated in the genocide had been stationed in Kashmir before the “Pakistani tribal invasion,” and a Hindu Prime Minister was removed and then imprisoned after he vocally opposed Kashmir’s accession to India.[6]

Objective analysts today refer to India’s position in Kashmir as one of “unlawful occupation” going back to the 1940s.[7] Chak estimates that, over the last 30 years, nearly 100,000 Kashmiri Muslims have been killed by Indian occupation troops.[8]

The current Indian government led by Narendra Modi promotes a mythic historical narrative while attempting to tighten its rule over Kashmir and Hinduize it.

Kashmir map
[Source: worldatlas.com]

Modi is a member of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which has ruled India since 2014.

When Modi was governor of Gujarat in the mid 2000s, he was banned from entering the U.S. over religious violence that he helped to incite.

criminal complaint filed in an Australian court charged Modi with ordering police to stand aside and allow Hindu mobs to rampage across Muslim-majority areas, resulting in the deaths of about 2,000 people and the destruction of the homes and businesses of 20,000 Muslims.

A person holding a piece of paper next to a person lying on the ground Description automatically generated
[Source: ummid.com]

As India’s Prime Minister, Modi has furthered discriminatory policies against Muslims while helping to transform Kashmir into what Chak calls an “open air prison” reminiscent of Gaza pre- and post-October 7.

A person with an object walking next to a person with an object

Description automatically generated
Indian army checkpoint in Kashmir. [Source: jacobin.com]

Chak reports on forced conversions and land thefts by the Indian government, and “cow vigilantism,” where BJP supporters roam the Kashmiri countryside searching for those whom they claim are unlawfully slaughtering cows who they steal from and then lynch.[9]

A group of people standing around a group of cows

Description automatically generated
Stolen Kashmiri cows. [Source: npr.org]

Some BJP officials have openly called for ethnic cleansing along the Israeli model in Gaza.

The reputable NGO Genocide Watch, led by Dr. Gregory Stanton, has issued two genocide alerts for Kashmir. Muslim rights are being systematically violated there through extrajudicial killings, unlawful arrest, torture and forced displacement.[10]

The final chapter of Chak’s book addresses India’s growing anti-China alliance with the U.S. and the danger of a war with China breaking out.

A June 2020 border clash leaving 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers dead could portend greater conflict if Modi continues to “tether India’s geopolitical horse to the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy.”[11]

A collage of men in military uniforms

Description automatically generated
Hopefully not the way of the future. [source: thequint.com]

According to Chak, India was better off when it adopted a policy of strategic autonomy in which it sustained good relations with both the U.S. and China and cleverly tried to play each country off the other to maximize India’s advantage.

In a devastating move for Sino-Indian relations, Modi’s India has become part of the Quad, an anti-China alliance with Australia, the UK and Japan, while carrying out more military exercises with the U.S. in proximity to China’s border.

A group of men in suits waving

Description automatically generated
The Quad. [Source: freepressjournal.in]

These measures, combined with India’s aggressive drives into Kashmir in violation of Pakistani and Chinese claims there, have greatly increased regional tensions and the threat of nuclear conflagration since India, Pakistan and China are all nuclear-armed powers.

On a state visit to Washington in late June, Narendra Modi was given the red-carpet treatment and feted at a gala dinner attended by some of Silicon Valley’s biggest names.

Biden Modi
President Biden, left, and Narendra Modi, India’s prime minister, toast during a State Dinner at the White House on June 22, 2023. [Source: foxnews.com]
Google CEO Sundar Pichai
oogle CEO Sundar Pichai and his wife Anjali Pichai arrive to attend the State Dinner hosted by President Biden for Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House on June 22, 2023. [Source: foxbusiness.com]

Most of the gala guests were probably unaware of the horrific atrocities being carried out in Kashmir, as they have gone largely unreported in the U.S. media and are rarely publicized by human rights NGOs or by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which primarily spotlights human rights abuses by U.S. enemies.

With a flush supply of U.S. weapons and no public outcry, Modi has carte blanche to do whatever he wants; a shame for Kashmiris and others living in the region who would bear the brunt of an all-out war that is slowly being provoked by the U.S.


  1. Farhan M. Chak, Nuclear Flashpoint: The War Over Kashmir (London: Pluto Press, 2024), 48.

  2. Ibid., 42.

  3. Ibid., 58, 59.

  4. Ibid., 71.

  5. Ibid., 108.

  6. Ibid., 109, 110. Kak was replaced by an ally of the Maharaja.

  7. Ibid., 111.

  8. Ibid., 168.

  9. Ibid., 117. Chak also details how the Indian government’s Hinduization campaign in Kashmir has included changing of the names of schools and removal of Muslim officials from any positions of authority. One Sikh woman who married a Muslim was forced to annul her marriage and marry someone else, while the Muslim man was imprisoned.

  10. Chak, Nuclear Flashpoint, 128, 144.

  11. Ibid., 148, 156.


CovertAction Magazine is made possible by subscriptionsorders and donations from readers like you.

Blow the Whistle on U.S. Imperialism

Click the whistle and donate

When you donate to CovertAction Magazine, you are supporting investigative journalism. Your contributions go directly to supporting the development, production, editing, and dissemination of the Magazine.

CovertAction Magazine does not receive corporate or government sponsorship. Yet, we hold a steadfast commitment to providing compensation for writers, editorial and technical support. Your support helps facilitate this compensation as well as increase the caliber of this work.

Please make a donation by clicking on the donate logo above and enter the amount and your credit or debit card information.

CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and your gift is tax-deductible for federal income purposes. CAI’s tax-exempt ID number is 87-2461683.

We sincerely thank you for your support.


Disclaimer: The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s). CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI), including its Board of Directors (BD), Editorial Board (EB), Advisory Board (AB), staff, volunteers and its projects (including CovertAction Magazine) are not responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. This article also does not necessarily represent the views the BD, the EB, the AB, staff, volunteers, or any members of its projects.

Differing viewpoints: CAM publishes articles with differing viewpoints in an effort to nurture vibrant debate and thoughtful critical analysis. Feel free to comment on the articles in the comment section and/or send your letters to the Editors, which we will publish in the Letters column.

Copyrighted Material: This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a not-for-profit charitable organization incorporated in the State of New York, we are making such material available in an effort to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.

Republishing: CovertAction Magazine (CAM) grants permission to cross-post CAM articles on not-for-profit community internet sites as long as the source is acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original CovertAction Magazine article. Also, kindly let us know at info@CovertActionMagazine.com. For publication of CAM articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: info@CovertActionMagazine.com.

By using this site, you agree to these terms above.


About the Author

Leave a Reply