So maybe Oswald really did shoot JFK with an old Italian army rifle—that now-famous Carcano. But I seriously doubt it. I just can’t picture a Marine Corps-trained rifleman selecting such a weapon to shoot anybody.
That is because Italian weapons of the World War II era had a lousy reputation and most Marines would have been aware of that. Moreover, the marksmanship attributed to Oswald that November day in 1963 is beyond belief.
Lee Harvey Oswald spent three years in the U.S. Marine Corps, leaving it in September 1959. That was shortly after I enlisted, my time in the USMC overlapping his by a few days. I served for four years and received my discharge a few months before the assassination.
That was more than half a century ago; nevertheless, Marine Corps training is pretty unforgettable. Having been in the USMC about the same time as the alleged assassin, I handled the same weapons and fired on the same type of rifle range as he did. In this essay I would like to say a bit about Marine Corps weapons training of that era and how those rifle-range realities conflict with the official narrative of the Warren Report.
“The most dangerous thing in the world is a Marine with his M1 rifle,” our Drill Instructors told us from day one. The M1 Garand was then the standard U.S. military rifle, and the Marine Corps took intense pride in training us to use it well. Whatever our military task might have been, whether truck driver, cook, office clerk, infantryman or radio operator, as Marines we were riflemen first of all.
We were issued the M1 during our first week in boot camp, but before we ever got to the firing range, we spent many weeks learning to dismantle and reassemble it, memorizing the name of every part and understanding its function. Terms like “trigger-housing-group” or “bolt locking lug” still come to mind after all these years. We also spent a huge amount of time on the manual of arms, practicing “right shoulder arms,” “present arms,” all that parade ground stuff. So we all came to know that rifle very, very well. All that was down pat before they ever let us fire it.
Actually, weapons training did not generally start there. Most guys I knew in the USMC came from gun culture, typically starting out in early childhood with a BB gun, later a .22 caliber target rifle, and eventually deer rifles and shotguns.
So the USMC was kind of like advanced training in weaponry, where guys learned the fine points of marksmanship, and also fired light and heavy machine guns as well as pistols. These guys generally liked guns, visited gun shows, and would often spend hours talking about weapons, discussing which firearm they would choose for this or that task.
For long-range sniper shooting one needs a very accurate weapon, the first choice being unanimously the 1903 Springfield rifle. The second choice would’ve been a Mauser. The Carcano was not in the running.
(Both the Springfield and the Mauser were ancient, but they were known to be accurate and reliable, and most importantly in the USMC gun culture of the early 1960s, those two rifles were considered legendary.)
Oswald apparently had some interest in guns. According to his brother, the two of them hunted rabbits with .22 caliber rifles. While in the Soviet Union, he reportedly joined a gun club. As for the Carcano that he allegedly owned, some gun buffs do acquire all sorts of antique and exotic firearms, and it would not surprise me to hear that he may have possessed a Carcano.
What I cannot believe is that he would have considered it a serviceable weapon for the crime of the century.
In dismissing the Carcano, I do not mean to say that Italian crafts people are not capable of making quality products. They indeed are. With all sorts of things, from clocks to cars, Italian artisans have a well-deserved reputation for excellence. They make good firearms too.
The 28-gauge shotgun with which then Vice President Dick Cheney blasted his friend Harry Whittington in the face and chest was a Perazzi shotgun made by Brescia, an Italian firm. It is a high-quality weapon, and not cheap. But that reputation did not extend to the equipment that was made for the Italian army during World War II.
Nevertheless, the Warren Commission concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald killed President John F. Kennedy with a Carcano. Yes, a Carcano! It’s hard to imagine a more bizarre story. While it served to promote the image of Oswald as an unhinged nutcase, an important element of the official narrative, it clashes with rifle-range realities.
Within the brief space of less than ten seconds, according to the Warren Commission, Oswald fired three shots, two of which hit the president. That would have been phenomenal marksmanship. Your average Marine is a good shot, but not that good. According to records that were made public, Oswald was about average.
Accurate shooting requires time and concentration; the faster one shoots, the less one hits. USMC marksmanship training included slow firing at 200 and 500 yards, and rapid fire at 300 yards. For rapid fire we were given sixty seconds to fire ten rounds. Our task also included reloading a clip since the magazine only held eight rounds.
Being semiautomatic, the M1 would fire as fast as we could pull the trigger—theoretically that is. In reality, the recoil knocks the rifle off target, so each time we fired we had to find the target and line up the sights all over again. That eats up time, precious seconds. Those are physical limitations on how fast anyone can shoot and expect to hit anything. With an average of six seconds for each of those ten shots, it might seem that we had plenty of time, but in reality, that one minute ran by very, very quickly, and accuracy was greatly diminished.
Unlike the semiautomatic M1 Garand, the Carcano has a bolt action, making it much slower to operate. That is true of any bolt-action rifle—they are not designed for rapid fire. And that particular Carcano was equipped with a telescopic sight, which makes rapid fire even more difficult. It takes much longer to re-sight a telescopic sight than an ordinary metal one. (Consider also the report that the telescopic sight on Oswald’s Carcano was defectively mounted—which would render any sort of accuracy impossible.)
Rather than a single gunman firing multiple shots, I believe the assassination was carried out by a team of shooters, perhaps none of whom may have had time to fire more than a single shot.
But multiple shooters implies a “conspiracy,” that forbidden, taboo word. So we are supposed to believe that the establishment which routinely plots regime change and assassination around the world would not do such a thing here in the United States? Really?
The marksmanship attributed to Oswald in that Texas town is like what we used to see on the silver screen. Shooting from the hip, Hollywood cowboys could knock a tin can out of the sky; many westerns had a scene like that. And so does the official story of what happened that November day in Dallas. Such are the mythical exploits of superheroes and arch-villains.
CovertAction Magazine is made possible by subscriptions, orders and donations from readers like you.
When you donate to CovertAction Magazine, you are supporting investigative journalism. Your contributions go directly to supporting the development, production, editing, and dissemination of the Magazine.
CovertAction Magazine does not receive corporate or government sponsorship. Yet, we hold a steadfast commitment to providing compensation for writers, editorial and technical support. Your support helps facilitate this compensation as well as increase the caliber of this work.
Please make a donation by clicking on the donate logo above and enter the amount and your credit or debit card information.
CovertAction Magazine, CovertAction Quarterly and CovertAction Information Bulletin are projects of CovertAction Institute, Inc., a not-for-profit organization incorporated in the State of New York.
We sincerely thank you for your support.
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s). CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI), including its Board of Directors (BD), Editorial Board (EB), Advisory Board (AB), staff, volunteers and its projects (including CovertAction Magazine) are not responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. This article also does not necessarily represent the views the BD, the EB, the AB, staff, volunteers, or any members of its projects.
Differing viewpoints: CAM publishes articles with differing viewpoints in an effort to nurture vibrant debate and thoughtful critical analysis. Feel free to comment on the articles in the comment section and/or send your letters to the Editors, which we will publish in the Letters column.
Copyrighted Material: This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a not-for-profit charitable organization incorporated in the State of New York, we are making such material available in an effort to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.
Republishing: CovertAction Magazine (CAM) grants permission to cross-post CAM articles on not-for-profit community internet sites as long as the source is acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original CovertAction Magazine article. Also, kindly let us know at info@CovertActionMagazine.com. For publication of CAM articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: info@CovertActionMagazine.com.
By using this site, you agree to these terms above.
About the Author
Daniel Borgström served in the U.S. Marine Corps during the Kennedy years.
He now lives in the San Francisco Bay Area and writes on various topics including travel, history, and struggles against corporate dominance.
He can be reached at: email@example.com.