So why do climate justice groups like 350.org support the war in Ukraine?
While the world’s climate negotiators gathered for the COP27 summit in Egypt, a new report published by the Transnational Institute, a Dutch think tank, emphasizes how rising global military spending is a great threat to efforts to combat climate change.
According to the report’s authors, “every dollar spent on the military not only increases greenhouse gas emissions, but also diverts financial resources, skills and attention away from tackling one of the greatest threats humanity has ever experienced.”
The trajectory of military spending has been rising since the late 1990s, reaching a record of $2 trillion in 2021. Between 2013 and 2021, the richest countries spent a combined $9.45 trillion on the military. By far the biggest military spender was the U.S. which, between 2001 and 2018, emitted an estimated 1.267 trillion tons of greenhouse gases, about 40% of which were attributed to the War on Terror and military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The Transnational Institute report emphasizes that “there is no evidence the military can be green,” despite public relations campaigns pointing to the installation of solar panels on bases, and replacement of fossil fuels in certain military hardware.
The military has been unable to find adequate fuel alternatives for its vehicles and fighter jets, which emit huge amounts of greenhouse gases, and keeps developing new weapons that pollute even more.
“Supercharging of Military Spending and Emissions”
According to the report, the war in Ukraine has “super-charged military spending and emissions.”
The European Commission anticipates a spending boost by its member states of at least $200 billion. The U.S. has adopted a record $847 billion military budget for 2023, and Canada announced in 2022 an extra $8 billion in military spending for the next five years.[1]
Climate goals are being quickly thrown out the window as resources are being diverted from climate finance to military spending.
In 2022, an extra 476 of the most gas-guzzling fighter jets, the F-35, were ordered—24 for the Czech Republic, 35 for Germany, 36 for Switzerland, and 375 additional ones for the U.S.
In June 2022, the UK shifted money from its climate finance budget to partially finance a £1bn military support package for Ukraine.
The main winner in all this has been the arms and oil industries, which have experienced major increases in its stock prices and profit margins while the rest of the world burns.
Asleep at the Wheel
Sadly, many leading climate justice groups have cheered on the war in Ukraine—undercutting their environmentalist mission.
On March 1, 2022, 350.org, an activist organization committed to a transition to renewable energy, published an article by Julia Krzyszkowska on its website that might as well have been published by the State Department, CIA or Defense Department.
The article was entitled “Solidarity with the People of Ukraine.” It proclaimed that “Ukraine, a peaceful democratic nation, is under a brutal military attack by Russia’s President Putin.”
However, Ukraine is not a peaceful democratic nation—its democracy was usurped in February 2014 when the U.S. backed a coup overthrowing the democratically elected President Viktor Yanukovych—and its current leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, has banned 11 opposition parties, hunted down dissidents, pressed to ban the Russian orthodox church, and muzzled opposition media while slaughtering thousands of people in eastern Ukraine.
In order to support Ukraine, Krzyszkowska advocates for readers to join anti-war (read anti-Russian) protests in their cities, tweet at their elected representatives using the #StandWithUkraine hashtag, or write or call their members of parliament, and ask them to support sanctions against Putin’s Russia.
Sanctions, however, are tantamount to an act of war that have triggered many hot wars in the past—like the Pacific War in World War II—and could very well trigger a nuclear war in this case.
Also of significance, the sanctions have targeted Russia’s manufacturing sector, hampering Russian President Vladimir Putin’s efforts to diversify Russia’s economy away from reliance on oil and gas exports, while resulting in growing shipments of liquified natural gas to Europe by U.S. companies that devastated the environment in the fracking revolution.
Krzyszkowska rationalized the sanctions on the grounds that “Russian oil and gas profits fill Putin’s war chest, and the world’s reliance on Russian pipelines let him invade a peaceful nation without fear of consequences. It’s our money flowing into Russian oil giants that’s funding violence in Ukraine.”
But if Krzyszkowska had any understanding of the conflict, she would know that Putin did not invade a peaceful nation on a whim in February 2022, but that Ukraine had started the war eight years earlier with U.S. backing when it attacked the people of eastern Ukraine after they voted for their autonomy following the February 2014 Maidan coup.
Putting an Environmental Canopy on the Anti-Putin Bandwagon
Krzyszkowska’s position dovetails with that of 350.org founder Bill McKibben who characterized Vladimir Putin as “evil” and said that the Biden administration had “played its hand wisely in the buildup to [Russia’s] invasion,” which it had actually helped provoke.
McKibben wrote in February that it was “amazing to watch people across the planet rallying to the defense of brave Ukraine—choirs singing outside Russian embassies, soccer teams refusing to play Russian teams. And it’s wonderful to watch governments rise to the occasion: shutting off airspace to Russian airplanes, or kicking them off international banking protocols.”
McKibben supported weapons shipments to Ukraine and advocated mass shipments of electric heat pumps to Europe to offset the destruction of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline and lessen European dependence on Russian fossil fuels.
An accelerated movement to decarbonize North America, in his view, would weaken oil and gas dependent Russia, and prompt its economy to “buckle,” paving the way for regime change in a fantasy shared by the Biden administration.
In a thoughtful critique of McKibben published on countercurrents.org, Raymond Lotta wrote that McKibben was playing a leading role in “putting an environmental canopy on the anti-Putin bandwagon…and objectively acting to bring environmental activists and broader progressives into an embrace of the strategic aims and war preparations of U.S. imperialism against its imperial rivals.”
The Biden administration, according to Lotta, “called for ‘energy independence’”—not a renewable-energy revolution in a recent state-of-the-union-because fossil-fuels are foundational to the profitable functioning of capitalism-imperialism, as it has developed.”
Lotta continued: “Oil is a strategic-military necessity, and an instrument of imperialist competition, rivalry, and domination. The essential truth is that only by making a revolution to overthrow this system and creating a sustainable socialist economy and society do we have a chance to address the climate crisis on the scale and with the urgency required.”
-
Russian military spending increased by 27% in 2022 compared to 2021. ↑
CovertAction Magazine is made possible by subscriptions, orders and donations from readers like you.
Blow the Whistle on U.S. Imperialism
Click the whistle and donate
When you donate to CovertAction Magazine, you are supporting investigative journalism. Your contributions go directly to supporting the development, production, editing, and dissemination of the Magazine.
CovertAction Magazine does not receive corporate or government sponsorship. Yet, we hold a steadfast commitment to providing compensation for writers, editorial and technical support. Your support helps facilitate this compensation as well as increase the caliber of this work.
Please make a donation by clicking on the donate logo above and enter the amount and your credit or debit card information.
CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and your gift is tax-deductible for federal income purposes. CAI’s tax-exempt ID number is 87-2461683.
We sincerely thank you for your support.
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s). CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI), including its Board of Directors (BD), Editorial Board (EB), Advisory Board (AB), staff, volunteers and its projects (including CovertAction Magazine) are not responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. This article also does not necessarily represent the views the BD, the EB, the AB, staff, volunteers, or any members of its projects.
Differing viewpoints: CAM publishes articles with differing viewpoints in an effort to nurture vibrant debate and thoughtful critical analysis. Feel free to comment on the articles in the comment section and/or send your letters to the Editors, which we will publish in the Letters column.
Copyrighted Material: This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a not-for-profit charitable organization incorporated in the State of New York, we are making such material available in an effort to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.
Republishing: CovertAction Magazine (CAM) grants permission to cross-post CAM articles on not-for-profit community internet sites as long as the source is acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original CovertAction Magazine article. Also, kindly let us know at info@CovertActionMagazine.com. For publication of CAM articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: info@CovertActionMagazine.com.
By using this site, you agree to these terms above.
About the Author
Jeremy Kuzmarov is Managing Editor of CovertAction Magazine.
He is the author of five books on U.S. foreign policy, including Obama’s Unending Wars (Clarity Press, 2019), The Russians Are Coming, Again, with John Marciano (Monthly Review Press, 2018), and Warmonger. How Clinton’s Malign Foreign Policy Launched the U.S. Trajectory From Bush II to Biden (Clarity Press, 2023).
He can be reached at: jkuzmarov2@gmail.com and followed on substack here.
GReat
The Anglo-American political economy contradictions are certainly mounting! Our PM “kind” Jacinda Ardern-headed government here in New Zealand/Aotearoa has become a prominent aggressive warmonger for the US/NATO proxy war on Russia in Ukraine. Zelensky will be addressing our Parliament next week via video-link.
The whole Parliament is united in its warmongering except for Te Pati Maori. PM Ardern’s commitment to genuine climate change is as hollow as our sham nuclear-free zone. She proclaimed early on in her government that “climate change is our nuclear free moment”.
Hysterical, satirical laughter is cackling off-stage!
Jeremy’s aptly article shows what a load of grossly hypocritical old crock our governments wallow in nowadays.
[…] New Report Details How Vast Military Spending By the Richest Countries Greatly Accelerates Climate C… […]
Dear Jeremy, Climate Justice groups are only interested in protesting against Mother Nature. They utterly ignore that many of the changes they protest about happen in the Universe, in a cyclical way. But they also ignore what you so clearly write about in this article. I’d like to add that apart from destroying the environment and causing devastating event – including ‘tsunamis’ with underwater explosions. I recently saw one such explosion (an American experiment) filmed from a drone, 300 miles of the Norwegian coastline. Had the explosion taken place 5 miles from the coastline, Oslo would have disappeared from the map.
Climate groups also never consider all the other changes military activity cause. I list a few: wars destroy life, families, societies, buildings and the economy. Wars create suffering, orphans, disease, poverty, hunger, homelessness. Since the War Club United Nations was invented, they’ve made over 90 million people lose their hones and country.
We must end with this poison of humanity and the planet before it finishes us.
The whole narrative that there is a “climate crisis” has no scientific basis whatsoever.
–