War in Ukraine turns people’s lives and affairs upside down. Dirty laundry, previously hidden, is on display. A Russian communication on March 6 mentions “evidence of an emergency clean-up performed by the Kyiv regime was found—aimed at eradicating traces of the military-biological program in Ukraine, financed by @DeptofDefense.”
A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson two days later spoke of “26 [U.S.] bio-labs and other related facilities in Ukraine.”
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki responded, saying that the United States “does not develop or possess such weapons anywhere.” Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland indicated “Ukraine has biological research facilities …[and] so we are working with the Ukrainians [to] prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces.”
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists reported that, as of February 25, “a network of U.S.-linked labs [existed] in Ukraine that work with dangerous pathogens.” Those 26 such facilities are “public and animal health labs.”
The gist of the Chinese and Russian communications is their claim that the U.S. Government is doing bio-warfare. In that regard, the “Richard G. Lugar Center for Public Health Research” in Tbilisi, Georgia, looms large. The U.S. Defense Department’s Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) paid for the Center’s construction and for its operation, between 2011 and 2018.
Bulgarian investigative journalist Dilyana Gaytandzhieva produced a report in 2018 alleging the Center had bio-weapons capabilities. She claimed that most of the Center’s staff were U.S. citizens enjoying diplomatic immunity and that at least three U.S. companies were doing bio-weapons research there. She indicates elsewhere that biologic specimens arrive by diplomatic pouch.
Gaytandzhieva’s extraordinarily detailed report displays dozens of official U.S. documents and graphics. She points out that DTRA-funded private companies carry out bio-weapons research and testing in laboratories and facilities located in Georgia, Ukraine, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Africa, and at Fort Detrick, Maryland, and the Dugway Proving Ground in Utah. U.S. government apologists have dismissed the report as Russian-inspired propaganda.
The distinction between offense and defensive preparations has ostensibly been clear as regards Fort Detrick. A “biological weapons program” existed there until 1969 when, as ordered by President Richard Nixon, it became a “biological defense program.” Apparently, no such official demarcation between offensive and defensive purposes has been applied to similar U.S. research installations elsewhere in the world.
One of the U.S. bio-laboratories abroad is Battelle Memorial Institute, “a $59 million subcontractor at Lugar Center” that, according to Gaytandzhieva, operates laboratories in eight countries across the globe and, as of 2018, “has been awarded some $2 billion [in] federal contracts” and ranks 23rd among U.S. government contractors.
As of that year, the Southern Research, Black & Veatch, and Metabiota , Inc.—which is financed in part by Rosemont-Seneca Partners, an investment firm whose founders included Hunter Biden—were operating one or more of the 11 Defense Department-funded bio-laboratories in Ukraine.
In a report published in January 2022 by CAM, Gaytandzhieva identifies the “US Federal Contractor Registration” as documenting that “DTRA allocated $80 million [to Black & Veatch] for biological research in Ukraine as of 30 July 2020.”
She charges that the contractor did more than merely fund the labs—as suggested by Victoria Nuland—but instead has been responsible for their day-to-day operation. Cited as evidence are “internal documents” showing that “independent experts were denied even a visit” to the laboratories.
Ominously, scientists funded by the Defense Department have developed a new way of transmitting viruses to plants. According to a Science magazine article in 2018, the Defense Department initiated a program named “Insect Allies” in 2017 and would continue it for four years. Biting insects are being studied at the Lugar Center in Georgia and presumably in other laboratories included in the multinational U.S. bio-weapons network, such as those in Ukraine.
The scientists have arranged for genetically modified viruses to infect insects that then go on to transmit the fixed-up viruses to plants where they alter the plants’ properties. Critics, mainly in Europe, doubt the peaceful purposes of the new methodology. They fear that the technique of “lab-modified self-spreading viruses” may ultimately be used to harm humans and animals.
Commentary from the Max Planck Institute in Germany interprets the Science magazine article this way: “[T]he findings of the Insect Allies Program could be more easily used for biological warfare than for routine agricultural use.” It cites a legal opinion saying that “the Insect Allies Program could be seen to violate the Biological Weapons Convention” (BWC)” which took effect in 1975.
The information assembled here pertains to the accusation put forth by the Russians that the U.S. government is operating a “military-biological program” with, implicitly, offensive capabilities. U.S. officials have offered nothing that absolutely refutes the claim.
There are two aspects of the relevant biologic research that move the narrative from suggestion to possibility. First, bio-medical and bio-industrial products are developed for both peaceful and war-making uses. Secondly, some military products are readily repurposed from defensive to offensive use.
At issue is a merging of purposes. A representative statement from officials in The Netherlands in 2013 makes the point:
On the one hand, many pathogenic organisms are very important to research and development in the fields of medicine, biology and agriculture. However, some of these organisms can also be used to develop biological weapons that may pose a threat to public health and the environment. The term “dual-use research” can be extended … “Dual-use research of concern” is the type of research that could be misused directly and whereby such misuse would have major consequences.
And from the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, November 2015:
[The] Biological Weapons Convention prohibits the development, production and stockpiling of biological weapons, but does not prevent states conducting research activities for peaceful and defensive purposes. However, distinguishing between permitted and prohibited activities is difficult at the level of basic biological research where the same techniques used to gain insight and understanding about fundamental life processes for the benefit of human health and welfare may also be used for the development of biological warfare agents.
While the purposes of this kind of biological research may be ambiguous, our conclusion here is less so. Specifically, we think that it’s quite possible that the U.S. government actually has been preparing for offensive biowarfare capabilities in Ukraine, and elsewhere. So far, not much information or evidence has cropped up as to deny that possibility. And besides, a grim historical record does exist that moves the matter of possibility quickly into the realm of probability.
That record includes previous resort to biowarfare, particularly in association with the U.S. war in Korea. Analyst Jeffrey Kaye in 2018 provided a readable version of the International Scientific Commission’s 1952 report on claims that, earlier that year, the U.S. military had carried out biowarfare “in an experimental fashion” against civilian populations in China and Korea.
The prestigious British scientist Joseph Needham led the Commission, and the World Peace Council sponsored it. The report consists of a 60-page summary and 600 pages of documentary material. Kaye states in his article that, indeed, “the report concluded that the U.S. had used a number of biological weapons, including use of anthrax, plague and cholera, disseminated by over a dozen different devices or methods.”
Cuba also fell victim to U.S. bioweapons. For example, a “U.S. intelligence source” told Newsday that “operatives linked to anti-Castro terrorists introduced African swine fever virus into Cuba in 1971 …[Soon] an outbreak of the disease forced the slaughter of 500,000 pigs.”
It is also highly probable also that U.S. operatives introduced hemorrhagic dengue into the island in 1981, with lethal results. Circumstantial evidence indicates strongly that a State Department crop-dusting plane widely disseminated the “plant-eating insect” Thrips palmi, and soon vegetable crops were destroyed.
Lastly, the record shows that the U.S. government only too easily has accepted that masses of humans are going to suffer and die. We recall:
- The nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the conventional bombing of Dresden that sickened and killed hundreds of thousands.
- Pursuit of wars, in Korea and Vietnam, in which millions died, plus wars and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan that took the lives of hundreds of thousands.
- Complicity in massacres in Indonesia and Latin America.
- Institution of economic sanctions that killed or incapacitated hundreds of thousands in Iraq, Cuba and Venezuela.
- Support for repressive regimes like apartheid South Africa and Saudi Arabia that killed and maimed.
A government that has done all this and lied about it, is likely lying again about the biolabs in Ukraine and plans it has for causing further devastation in the name of “national security.”
CovertAction Magazine is made possible by subscriptions, orders and donations from readers like you.
When you donate to CovertAction Magazine, you are supporting investigative journalism. Your contributions go directly to supporting the development, production, editing, and dissemination of the Magazine.
CovertAction Magazine does not receive corporate or government sponsorship. Yet, we hold a steadfast commitment to providing compensation for writers, editorial and technical support. Your support helps facilitate this compensation as well as increase the caliber of this work.
Please make a donation by clicking on the donate logo above and enter the amount and your credit or debit card information.
CovertAction Magazine, CovertAction Quarterly and CovertAction Information Bulletin are projects of CovertAction Institute, Inc., a not-for-profit organization incorporated in the State of New York.
We sincerely thank you for your support.
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s). CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI), including its Board of Directors (BD), Editorial Board (EB), Advisory Board (AB), staff, volunteers and its projects (including CovertAction Magazine) are not responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. This article also does not necessarily represent the views the BD, the EB, the AB, staff, volunteers, or any members of its projects.
Differing viewpoints: CAM publishes articles with differing viewpoints in an effort to nurture vibrant debate and thoughtful critical analysis. Feel free to comment on the articles in the comment section and/or send your letters to the Editors, which we will publish in the Letters column.
Copyrighted Material: This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a not-for-profit charitable organization incorporated in the State of New York, we are making such material available in an effort to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.
Republishing: CovertAction Magazine (CAM) grants permission to cross-post CAM articles on not-for-profit community internet sites as long as the source is acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original CovertAction Magazine article. Also, kindly let us know at info@CovertActionMagazine.com. For publication of CAM articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: info@CovertActionMagazine.com.
By using this site, you agree to these terms above.