Prisoners to get reduced sentences if they donate their organs or bone  marrow in Massachusetts bill | Daily Mail Online

Fits into dubious history of medical coercion and experimentation on vulnerable populations in the U.S.

Two Democratic members of the Massachusetts state legislature have proposed a bill that would give state prisoners between 60 and 365 days off their sentences if they donate a kidney, bone marrow, skin, or “other organs” to people in the general population who have a need for those organs.

A statement by the bill’s sponsors, Reps. Judith Garcia and Carlos Gonzalez, says that the “act to establish the Massachusetts incarcerated individual bone marrow and organ donation program…would restore bodily autonomy to incarcerated folks.”

That nonsensical statement did not address the fact that both the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the federal government have a sick history of medical coercion and experimentation on vulnerable people. And those vulnerable people are usually people of color. It also did not address the fact that the bill is likely illegal in the first place.

Advocates for the incarcerated, as well as medical ethicists, were quick to condemn the bill. Project Turnaround founder Romilda Pereira told the Boston Globe that the idea behind the bill was akin to organ harvesting. An epidemiologist for Brigham & Women’s Hospital called the entire idea “perverse.”

Prisoners to get reduced sentences if they donate their organs or bone  marrow in Massachusetts bill | Daily Mail Online

The Federal Bureau of Prisons has long allowed prisoners to donate organs to immediate family members only.

The state of Utah allows the families of deceased prisoners to donate their organs. But that’s the extent of prison organ donation programs nationwide. No other state allows organ donations for any reason. The nonprofit Ethics Committee of the United Network for Organ Sharing issued a statement in response to the bill saying, “Any law or proposal that allows a person to trade an organ for a reduced sentence raises numerous ethical issues.”

The fact that the bill would create a five-person panel, only one member of which would be a prisoner’s rights advocate, to determine how much time the prisoner gets off for his donation makes the entire plan smell worse.

Indeed, the whole idea is deeply disturbing. But it’s not at all new.

In 1942, Harvard Medical School Professor Edwin Cohn injected 64 Massachusetts state prisoners with cows’ blood to see how they would tolerate it in an experiment for the U.S. Navy. The results were catastrophic. All of the prisoners became ill and six died.

Edwin Cohn [Source:]

Between 1937 and 1972, the U.S. Public Health Service took advantage of hundreds of unwitting African-American men who, in exchange for free “medical care,” food, and a burial service, were injected with syphilis to treat their “bad blood.” None of the participants were told that they had syphilis, nor were they ever given penicillin, which had already been proven to cure the disease.

Tuskegee Experiment Scandal: U.S. doctors failed to treat syphilis to see  what would happen

There are a number of these examples from throughout American history. But perhaps the worst offender has been the CIA. Just a quick sampling shows that the CIA has experimented on unwitting Americans and others over the course of decades.

  • MK-ULTRA is probably the best-known example of government experimentation on unwitting individuals. The official explanation to Congress of the purpose of MK-ULTRA was the development of drugs to aid in interrogations. But it wasn’t quite that simple. Under MKULTRA, the CIA experimented on unwitting Americans, including their own employees. Investigators for the Church Committee concluded that MKULTRA “aimed to develop mind-controlling drugs for use against the Soviet bloc” and “to produce a perfect truth drug for interrogating suspected Soviet spies and to explore other possibilities of mind control.”
  • A similar operation, dubbed MKOFTEN, started off as a study on dopamine before morphing into something far more sinister. By the end of the “study,” it had expanded to include the hallucinogen ibogaine and to LSD in the hopes of “creating a new pharmacologically active drug affecting the central nervous system to modify men’s behavior.” Thousands of active duty US servicemen were unwittingly dosed during this operation.
  • Operation Midnight Climax was a program in the 1960s and 1970s, carried out in CIA safehouses in San Francisco, to dose non-consenting individuals—mostly homeless men and prostitutes—with LSD and other drugs, monitor them from behind one-way glass, and determine if they would voluntarily reveal secrets. The prostitutes eventually were also taught to dose their clients and were then debriefed as to whether or not the johns had revealed any personal secrets.
  • The CIA’s very first foray into drug experimentation was Project CHATTER, in which both animals and humans were dosed with the drugs anabasine (a product of the tobacco plant, it is chemically similar to nicotine,) scopolamine (a drug used to treat motion sickness and post-operative nausea,) and mescaline (a hallucinogen similar to LSD and psilocybin) to see what the effects might be. The operation ended in 1953.
TIL in a CIA program called "Operation Midnight Climax", Prostitutes were  enlisted by the CIA to lure men to 'safehouses' in San Francisco where they  were administered LSD without their consent. CIA

The obvious question for the Democrats who have sponsored the Massachusetts bill is, “Have you learned nothing from history?” I would add, “Have you no decency?

Gonzalez, one of the bill’s authors and chairman of the state Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, which has jurisdiction over the state Department of Corrections, told a local television station, “I’ve put more effort into this bill after visiting a friend, who I consider a brother, in the hospital who is required to have dialysis three to four times a week while he awaits a kidney transplant. He’s the father of three children and he is in stage 4 of kidney failure. I love my friend and I’m praying through this legislation that we can extend the chances of life.”

But who’s life? Do you coerce an incarcerated person who is poor, disadvantaged, and probably a person of color into giving a literal piece of his body, jeopardizing his own health, in an immoral and unethical manner because you feel sorry for your friend?

My educated guess is that this program is not about “giving bodily autonomy to incarcerated folks” or about providing a “path for organ or bone marrow donation for incarcerated folks in Massachusetts,” as Garcia, the other author, tweeted.

Instead, I think the truth was spoken by a medical researcher in 1973 in a private talk with Jessica Mitford, author of the book Kind and Usual Punishment. That researcher said, “Prisoners are fine experimental material…and much cheaper than chimpanzees.” That’s the bottom line.

CovertAction Magazine is made possible by subscriptionsorders and donations from readers like you.

Blow the Whistle on U.S. Imperialism

Click the whistle and donate

When you donate to CovertAction Magazine, you are supporting investigative journalism. Your contributions go directly to supporting the development, production, editing, and dissemination of the Magazine.

CovertAction Magazine does not receive corporate or government sponsorship. Yet, we hold a steadfast commitment to providing compensation for writers, editorial and technical support. Your support helps facilitate this compensation as well as increase the caliber of this work.

Please make a donation by clicking on the donate logo above and enter the amount and your credit or debit card information.

CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and your gift is tax-deductible for federal income purposes. CAI’s tax-exempt ID number is 87-2461683.

We sincerely thank you for your support.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s). CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI), including its Board of Directors (BD), Editorial Board (EB), Advisory Board (AB), staff, volunteers and its projects (including CovertAction Magazine) are not responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. This article also does not necessarily represent the views the BD, the EB, the AB, staff, volunteers, or any members of its projects.

Differing viewpoints: CAM publishes articles with differing viewpoints in an effort to nurture vibrant debate and thoughtful critical analysis. Feel free to comment on the articles in the comment section and/or send your letters to the Editors, which we will publish in the Letters column.

Copyrighted Material: This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a not-for-profit charitable organization incorporated in the State of New York, we are making such material available in an effort to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.

Republishing: CovertAction Magazine (CAM) grants permission to cross-post CAM articles on not-for-profit community internet sites as long as the source is acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original CovertAction Magazine article. Also, kindly let us know at For publication of CAM articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:

By using this site, you agree to these terms above.

About the Author

Leave a Reply