Fellows at the Atlantic Council advocate bombing and confronting Russia, while eschewing any opportunities for peace.
The Atlantic Council is an American think tank, founded in 1961, which lies at the heart of what 27-year CIA veteran Ray McGovern and whistleblower termed the Military-Industrial-Congressional-Intelligence-Media-Academia-Think Tank Complex (MICIMATTC).
Its close ties to the CIA were evident when its former executive vice-president, Damon Wilson, was appointed CEO of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a CIA offshoot that promotes propaganda and supports dissidents in countries whose governments have been targeted by the U.S. for regime change.
Former CIA Director James Woolsey is listed as a lifetime director of the Atlantic Council, while former CIA Directors Leon Panetta, Robert Gates and David Petraeus are also listed on its Board, along with such war criminals as Henry Kissinger, and Condeleezza Rice.
Over the past decade, the Atlantic Council has published countless reports on Russia’s kleptocracy and disinformation under President Vladimir Putin, and has hosted anti-Russian dissidents and Belarusian opposition figures such as Svetlana Tikhanovskaya who called for more aggressive imperial intervention by the U.S. in Belarusian politics.
One of its fellows, Michael Weiss, spreads his anti-Russia invective as an editor at the popular online media outlet, The Daily Beast. He helps run a neo-McCarthyite website, PropOrNot that promotes the worst kind of fear mongering imaginable while attacking independent media outlets, including the Ron Paul Institute, for allegedly advancing Russian propaganda.
In 2015, the Atlantic Council helped prepare a proposal for arming the Ukrainian military with offensive weaponry like Javelin anti-tank missiles—the same year that it presented its Distinguished Leadership Award to Marillyn Adams Hewson, then the CEO of Lockheed Martin, which produces Javelin missiles and many other strategic weapon platforms.
Since the commencement of Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine, the Atlantic Council has doubled down on its long-standing Russophobia, calling for bombing Russia and starting World War III.
In February, Matthew Kroenig, the Deputy Director of the Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, argued for consideration of the U.S. preemptive use of “’tactical’ nuclear weapons.[1] This would not only kill thousands of people directly but likely cause what scientists characterize as a “nuclear winter” by injecting so much smoke and debris into the air that it will block sunlight and cause a precioitious drop in global tempratures, affecting food production across the globe.
Marketing Arm of the Military Security Complex
Within a few years of the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty in 1949, voluntary organizations emerged in member countries of the North Atlantic Alliance (NATO) to promote what was called public understanding and support institutions that would enhance collective security. In 1954, the Atlantic Treaty Association was created and an international network of citizen associations was formally linked.
In 1961, former Secretaries of State Dean Acheson and Christian Herter, along with Will Clayton, William Foster and Theodore Achilles, recommended the creation of a new entity, the Atlantic Council of the United States, which would bring together U.S. citizens who supported the Atlantic Alliance.
Initially, it was designed to establish cooperation between the United States and Western European countries against the Soviet Union, but with the collapse of the USSR and the Eastern Bloc, the organization rapidly expanded its activities far beyond the Atlantic. In particular, the subject of its close attention was Russia, other countries that emerged on the territory of the former Soviet Union, as well as Eastern European states.
The Atlantic Council currently positions itself as a forum for political, business and intellectual international leaders. The Council’s structure includes regional centers as well as a number of functional programs related to international security and the global economy.
The official mission of the Atlantic Council is to help build constructive leadership and engagement in international affairs, based on the central role of the Atlantic community in solving global problems. The assumption of course being that the Atlantic community is superior to all others.[2]
Paul Craig Roberts, the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under Ronald Reagan, calls the Atlantic Council the “marketing arm of the military-security complex.”
In February 2009, James L. Jones, then-chairman of the Atlantic Council, stepped down in order to serve as President Obama’s new National Security Advisor and was succeeded by Sen. Chuck Hagel. Four years later, Hagel stepped down to serve as U.S. Secretary of Defense.
Funding
Numerous media reports, as well as the Atlantic Council’s own reports, show that the organization’s largest contributor is government grants from the U.S. State Department.[3]
The State Department and the U.S. Department of Defense are active sponsors of the organization. For 2021, the Atlantic Council received between $500,000 and $1 million from the U.S. Department of State alone.
Also among the sponsors is the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), which has provided between $100,000 and $249,000 to the think tank.
In addition, the Atlantic Council is sponsored by numerous foundations, organizations and commercial companies. For example, the NED and United States Agency for International Development (USAID) are among them.
Further main donors include Facebook, the French Ministry of Armed Forces, the Foreign Ministries of Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Estonia, Norway, Lithuania and the Czech Republic, the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations, the largest defense concerns, e.g., Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Raytheon, the U.S. Navy and Air Force, NATO, as well as many American business giants such as FedEx, Apple, Amazon, etc.
Dubious Relationships
The Grayzone project reported in 2019 that the Atlantic Council had initiated a lucrative relationship with a corruption-tainted Ukrainian gas company, the Burisma Group, worth as much as $250,000 a year. This is the same company that appointed Joe Biden’s son, Hunter to its board, even though he had no industry experience, along with former CIA #3 man Cofer Black.
Burisma’s relationship with the Atlantic Council is indicative of the acceptance of tainted money that skews the mission of the organization and drives the Atlantic Council to adopt hawkish positions, especially toward Russia, in line with the interests of MICIMATTC.
Tellingly, one of the Atlantic Council’s fellows during Donald Trump’s presidency was Michael Carpenter, a top aide to Joe Biden, a super-hawk on Ukraine championing the provision of Javelin missiles when he was Vice President under Barack Obama.
In July 2018, Carpenter helped welcome Andriy Parubiy, the speaker of the Rada (the Ukrainian parliament), to a series of meetings on Capitol Hill.
Parubiy is the founder of the Social National Party, which The Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson described as “openly neo-fascist.” As The Grayzone Project reported, Parubiy appeared in a Nazi-style uniform, packing a pistol beneath a Wolfsangel symbol on the cover of his Mein Kampf-style memoir, “View from the Right.”
Targeting the Kremlin
The ability to influence public opinion has become a critical asset in any state’s arsenal. The war in Ukraine is a clear example of this. In order to increase global support for their country, Ukraine’s political leaders target appeals for help to specific audiences and receive it from the Atlantic Council, among others.
All materials in one way or another concerning Russia are presented one-sidedly and seek to form a negative image of Russia, which prevents the realization of more peaceful relations between the U.S. and Russia.
One of the reports from the Atlantic Council—“The Kremlin’s Trojan Horses”—is characteristic in its bias and levying of accusations directed against Russia that are not verifiable. The report claims that Russia, for example, has been incessantly interfering in both U.S. and European politics and should be held accountable for its actions.[4] But it does not offer definitive proof and ignores evidence that has emerged, which points to the politicized dimensions of the allegations.
Other reports declare Russia, along with China, to be the main enemy of the U.S., which engages in cyber and other forms of hybrid warfare, necessitating the creation of a transatlantic counter-hybrid strategy to combat.[5]
It can be assumed that the NATO-led Atlantic Council is already actively working to create new information weapons to manipulate the human mind and change human behavior. The exploitation of human consciousness has become a mass industry.
And it is expected that new tools of artificial intelligence will soon provide specialists in the field of information-psychological operations radically expanded opportunities to manipulate the human mind and change human behavior. It is highly likely that information-warfare operations are also being tested against the entire global community.
So in 2021, August Cole of the Atlantic Council and Hervé Le Guyader produced a sci-fi essay—though in the first part of the publication, it describes high-ranking NATO officers meeting in Tallinn in 2028 and having a conversation with very concrete, practical recommendations.[6]
For example:
1: Warfare has changed radically away from kinetics, and the same should be true for NATO. Traditional military-only kinetic operations will always exist, but the overall threat picture is much larger, as demonstrated every day. If NATO sticks to its current five areas of operations, its capabilities will not suffice to repel attacks, and that is a straight path to obsolescence.
2: Trust, especially between allies, is a deliberate vulnerability. Like any international organization, NATO relies on trust between its partners. Trust is based on respect for some explicit and tangible agreements, but also on “invisible contracts,” an exchange of values, which is not easy when so many Allied nations have been fighting each other for centuries.
Given these developments and the existing open statements about the need to conduct a new type of non-kinetic warfare aimed at the minds of people, the question arises not only about the need to counter such aggressive attempts, but also about their admissibility, since we are not even talking about conditional enemies, but a threat to most countries and peoples of the world, including citizens of NATO countries, as these technologies of manipulation and influence, first of all, are tested on them.
The Atlantic Council recommends countering Russian efforts to resolve the conflict in Ukraine peacefully: Russia’s defeat would, allegedly, give Western countries an opportunity to restructure the post-World War II global security system. It proposes abolishing veto rights of permanent members of the UN Security Council organization while increasing the role of NATO and the EU in Eurasia.[7]
The organization’s expert Anders Åslund stated that NATO should bomb Russia—a call for World War III essentially.
It is noteworthy that Åslund expressed the opinion that Ukrainian officials are not interested in fighting corruption, because they control the economy and profit from it: “Because they are interested in corruption, they live off it. The Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko probably gets a lot of money for not fighting corruption. If he fought corruption, he would earn nothing but his small salary.”[8] Then he suddenly changed his position and retracted his statements about Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko.[9]
In an official report released by the Atlantic Council, experts called for increased supplies of offensive weapons to Ukraine, which should ensure that Ukrainian fighters capture the republics of Donbass along with their capitals of Donetsk and Luhansk. [10]
Another Council fellow, Max Brooks, suggested that assets of Russian citizens frozen in the West could be used to buy aircraft for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
As we can see, the Atlantic Council, a NATO think tank, is inciting Western countries to open confrontation with Russia by threatening the outbreak of nuclear war.
The Council also calls on the U.S. and its partners to deepen and expand their military and financial support for Ukraine. Experts emphasize that the Biden administration considers the conflict in Ukraine to be the decisive battle of the post-Cold War era.
It is worth noting that, only since January 2021, the U.S. has allocated more than $32.8 billion in security assistance to Ukraine, while, according to experts, the above funds could have been spent on American citizens and the stabilization of the U.S. and world economy.
In order to weaken Russia’s influence, the Atlantic Council calls on post-Soviet countries to stop supporting the Russian identity and suggests that Western leaders foment discord within political blocs created by Russia.
Thus, the Atlantic Council is used by U.S. government circles in order to set different countries against each other at the expense of U.S. citizens. That is why it is extremely important today to address the issue of providing and communicating objective information to the world community about the ongoing events, including the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. This is necessary, among other things, in order to avoid all kinds of speculation and further loss of life.
-
In John Bellamy Foster, John Ross, and Deborah Veneziale, Washington’s New Cold War: A Socialist Perspective (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2023), 42. ↑
-
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/about/ ↑
-
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Atlantic-Council-Annual-Report-2021-2022.pdf ↑
-
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/the-kremlins-trojan-horses-3-0/ ↑
-
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/a-strategic-concept-for-countering-russian-and-chinese-hybrid-threats/ ↑
-
https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/ENG%20version%20v6.pdf ↑
-
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/ukrainian-victory-can-deal-a-decisive-blow-to-russian-imperialism/ ↑
-
https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2018/02/2/7170362/ ↑
-
https://ukrainian.voanews.com/a/aslund-pro-lutsenka/4841240.html ↑
-
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/russia-crisis-military-assessment-how-ukraine-can-take-the-fight-to-russia/ ↑
CovertAction Magazine is made possible by subscriptions, orders and donations from readers like you.
Blow the Whistle on U.S. Imperialism
Click the whistle and donate
When you donate to CovertAction Magazine, you are supporting investigative journalism. Your contributions go directly to supporting the development, production, editing, and dissemination of the Magazine.
CovertAction Magazine does not receive corporate or government sponsorship. Yet, we hold a steadfast commitment to providing compensation for writers, editorial and technical support. Your support helps facilitate this compensation as well as increase the caliber of this work.
Please make a donation by clicking on the donate logo above and enter the amount and your credit or debit card information.
CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and your gift is tax-deductible for federal income purposes. CAI’s tax-exempt ID number is 87-2461683.
We sincerely thank you for your support.
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s). CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI), including its Board of Directors (BD), Editorial Board (EB), Advisory Board (AB), staff, volunteers and its projects (including CovertAction Magazine) are not responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. This article also does not necessarily represent the views the BD, the EB, the AB, staff, volunteers, or any members of its projects.
Differing viewpoints: CAM publishes articles with differing viewpoints in an effort to nurture vibrant debate and thoughtful critical analysis. Feel free to comment on the articles in the comment section and/or send your letters to the Editors, which we will publish in the Letters column.
Copyrighted Material: This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a not-for-profit charitable organization incorporated in the State of New York, we are making such material available in an effort to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.
Republishing: CovertAction Magazine (CAM) grants permission to cross-post CAM articles on not-for-profit community internet sites as long as the source is acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original CovertAction Magazine article. Also, kindly let us know at info@CovertActionMagazine.com. For publication of CAM articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: info@CovertActionMagazine.com.
By using this site, you agree to these terms above.
About the Author
Valeriy Krylko is a freelance journalist, and translator of news articles in online media (English-Russian).
These articles are published in European and Russian-language media.
He is closely affiliated with independent outlets covering the Ukrainian-Russian conflict, and can be reached at: vkrylko098@gmail.com
.jpg){kind=link}
Jeremy, earlier today I sent you a message which I reproduce her, as I feel Valeriy Krylko and those who follow him should read it.
Due to the failure of all antiwar organisations and individuals in the world at demanding the permanent and total abolition of militarism and all war industries, the tacit message Governments receive is “you may plan, concoct, negotiate and carry out all the slaughter and destruction games you wish”. TRAGIC.
Alberto Portugheis
President HUFUD
http://www.hufud.org
Addendum: I’d like to add, no offence to you and many other journalists, that to Antiwar organizations I’d like to add Antiwar journalists. To me, journalists, apart from informing, should also enlighten, educate. Whilst Journalism keeps speaking about the ‘Defense’ industry, there will NEVER be Peace. The Media should always speak the FULL truth. The Defense industry would NOT exist without the ATTACK industry. This is why Chris Sorensen speaks of the WAR industry.
In short, if there is WWII, as there was WWI , WWII, Vietnam, Korea, Angola, Sudan, Israel-Palestine, Israel-Lebanon and many other wars, Biafra, Cambodia and many other genocides, it is, if we think with our hearts and minds, humanity’s fault if we have WWIII.
There is NO ONE else to blame. Politicians are not magicians. They cannot sell machine guns, bullets, grenades, landmines, bombs, rockets and torpedoes to create life, equality, justice, etc.
HOPE my words will reach many and that many will start shouting ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!!
THE ARTICLE by Jed Judson, of the Global Force Symposium
The US Army moves to tweak its formations for future conflicts
Key service official wants to make light units more survivability and increase their combat punch.WASHINGTON — The U.S Army plans to spend roughly the next two years finalizing key decisions on what its future formational design will look like in the 2040s, the service’s four-star general in charge of modernization and requirements said at the Association of the U.S. Army’s Global Force Symposium last week.
“2040 seems like a long way away,” Gen. James Rainey, Army Futures Command boss, said in a March 29 speech, “but I believe we have about an 18 to 24 month window that we need to pursue with a sense of urgency to figure out what’s going to be different, what’s the operating environment going to look like; not to get it right, but to make sure we don’t get it really wrong and to be in a better position than whoever we’re fighting.”
AFC “has a responsibility to find that deep future operating environment, and we need to start iterating on the concept. We hope to be in the draft concept business by this fall, probably,” he said.
The command was established in 2018 to help the service focus on modernizing the force. Taking over the command last fall, Rainey is its second commander.
Working with Training and Doctrine Command, AFC will need to figure out how the Army will fight in the future – specifically a 2040 benchmark – and then design fighting formations that can support that, Rainey told Defense News in an exclusive interview at the show.
The Army is well on its way to fielding over 30 weapon systems and other capabilities in 2030 that will enable the service to fight across all domains against adversaries able to deny access to key terrain, Rainey said.
“We’re going to buy vehicles, systems, weapons, radios, but we need to transform our formations as a formation,” he said in his speech. “We buy things, but we fight formations, so everything we do material-wise needs to be ‘how does this fit into a formation?’ And we’ll make better decisions, candidly. And most importantly, we’ll put better-capable formations on the battlefield.”
There are still a variety of questions that need to be answered as the service builds its future force, and many of these need to be considered quickly. “Let me talk about the sense of urgency to 2040,” Rainey said in his speech. “When I say 2040, I’m talking about a fully fielded Army of 2040. To do that we will have to be in full-up aggressive fielding mode by about 2035.”
If capability needs to be fielded by 2035 to build the force of 2040, “they probably need to be prototyping, in low-rate production, something like that, in that space by 2031,” Rainey said.
Right now the Army is working on a five-year defense-spending plan that covers fiscal 2025 through 2029, he pointed out.
Concepts that are drafted over this time will need to be “rigorously, aggressively” verified through experimentation, according to Rainey. The Army’s Project Convergence “campaign of learning” effort is one of those places for experimentation, but the service will experiment persistently through other means like theater-located exercises to better craft concepts.
[…] https://covertactionmagazine.com/2023/04/04/war-mongering-cia-connected-think-tank-calls-for-world-w… […]