Scott Stantis via US News & World Report
[Source: amnestyusa.org]

But instead, he pandered to the CIA’s leadership and to the politicians who put them there.

A friend from Covert Action Magazine recently sent me a video of former CIA Acting General Counsel John Rizzo giving an interview upon his retirement from the CIA. The interview is seven years old. But it is as current—and as infuriating—today as it was the day he sat for it.

Rizzo died last August, and he’s been quickly forgotten. But his legacy lives on. The prisoners whose capture, rendition, and torture he advocated for are still being held. None of them have been granted a trial before a jury of their peers. Indeed, many of them have yet to be formally accused of a crime. Yet they languish in Guantanamo. That’s thanks to John Rizzo and people like him.

John Rizzo | Human Rights First
John Rizzo [Source: humanrightsfirst.org]

Like many of you, my mother taught me that if I didn’t have something nice to say about somebody, I shouldn’t say anything at all. That’s been a tough rule to live by over the years, but I’ve tried. But when Rizzo died last August and I turned to the Washington Post, the New York Times, and other outlets to read of his passing, not a single kind word came to mind.

My mother would be angry (or disappointed) with me for saying it, but, as I said at the time, the world is a better place without John Rizzo in it. Rizzo was the unapologetic godfather of the CIA’s torture program, a monstrous crime against humanity that he defended unabashedly until his death.

Protestors mark 18th anniversary of Guantánamo Bay detention camp and call for its closure and ‘accountability for torture’ near the White House, on 11 January.
Protesters demand closing of Guantanamo Bay. [Source: theguardian.com]

John Rizzo was a rather complicated figure. I knew him well from my days as the Executive Assistant to one of the CIA’s Associate Deputy Directors. I was former CIA Director George Tenet’s morning briefer during the Iraq War, and Rizzo routinely sat in on the sessions. He was a nice enough guy—quick with a smile and a nod. He was dapper, with a well-groomed beard that made him look more like a 19th century businessman in search of his top hat than a seasoned and very political attorney whose job it was to lay out the legal justifications for horrific crimes yet to be committed.

Rizzo told a German newspaper in 2014 that immediately after I led a 2002 raid that resulted in the capture of Abu Zubaydah, then thought to be the Number 3 in al-Qaeda’s leadership, he “strolled around CIA headquarters smoking a cigar and ponder(ing) the possibility of a second terrorist attack after which Mr. Zubaydah would gleefully tell our interrogators, ‘Yes, I knew all about them (additional terrorist plans), and you didn’t get me to talk.’”

He went on that, “There would be hundreds, perhaps thousands of American dead on the streets again. And in the post-mortem investigations, it would all come out that the CIA considered these techniques but was too risk-averse to carry them out, and that I was the guy who stopped them.” He told The Hill newspaper in 2015, “Sure, I thought about the morality of it. But the times were such that what I thought would have been equally immoral is if we just unilaterally dismissed the possibility of undertaking a program that could have potentially saved thousands more American lives.”

Rizzo missed the point in 2002 and he missed it again in 2014 and 2015. Nobody doubted his patriotism. Nobody doubted that he wanted to disrupt the next terrorist attack. We all did. But we also all took an oath to “protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.” We took an oath to uphold the laws of the United States. And no number of legal backflips can justify committing war crimes or crimes against humanity.

That’s what Rizzo authorized. He opened a Pandora’s box that couldn’t be closed again. He crossed a line that couldn’t be uncrossed. He gave the green light for torture, for murder, for international kidnappings. He made the annual Human Rights Report that Congress mandates of the State Department every year a bad joke. And he never doubted or second-guessed himself. He was supposed to be the Constitution’s last line of defense inside the CIA. But instead, he pandered to the CIA’s leadership and to the politicians who put them there.

Book: CIA used torture to get intel - CNN Video
Waterboarding torture method sanctioned by John Rizzo. [Source: cnn.com]

It was interesting to me that when Rizzo died, the two people the Washington Post found to talk about him for his obituary were George Tenet and former CIA Deputy Director John McLaughlin, Rizzo’s bosses and co-conspirators in heinous human rights abuses.

One of his post-CIA colleagues at the Washington, DC power law firm of Steptoe & Johnson, however, analyzed Rizzo’s career more clearly, perhaps not even realizing what he was saying.

He wrote, “For decades he was the last word on what CIA operatives could and could not do within the law. He knew that these judgments were as much about political prognostication as about applying abstract principles of law, and that critics of the American intelligence agencies would always second-guess his conclusions. He knew that using harsh interrogation techniques would sooner or later make the agency vulnerable to claims of lawlessness and torture. He may not have been convinced that the techniques in question would be crucial to preventing another attack or defeating al-Qaeda, but he was clear that the final call should not be made by lawyers. He threw everything into the effort to give the nation’s leaders room to make the decision, including, it turned out, his own reputation.”

And there it is: The admission that Rizzo cared more about—sacrificed his career for—politics rather than for the Constitution and the rule of law. Rizzo could have said, “This is wrong. We’re a nation of laws. We’re a nation of respect for human rights. We won’t put ourselves on the same level with the terrorists.” But he didn’t. That is his legacy, no matter how many post-mortem interviews find a second life on YouTube.


CovertAction Magazine is made possible by subscriptionsorders and donations from readers like you.

Blow the Whistle on U.S. Imperialism

 

 

Click the whistle and donate

 

When you donate to CovertAction Magazine, you are supporting investigative journalism. Your contributions go directly to supporting the development, production, editing, and dissemination of the Magazine.

CovertAction Magazine does not receive corporate or government sponsorship. Yet, we hold a steadfast commitment to providing compensation for writers, editorial and technical support. Your support helps facilitate this compensation as well as increase the caliber of this work.

Please make a donation by clicking on the donate logo above and enter the amount and your credit or debit card information.

CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and your gift is tax-deductible for federal income purposes. CAI’s tax-exempt ID number is 87-2461683.

We sincerely thank you for your support.


Disclaimer: The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s). CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI), including its Board of Directors (BD), Editorial Board (EB), Advisory Board (AB), staff, volunteers and its projects (including CovertAction Magazine) are not responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. This article also does not necessarily represent the views the BD, the EB, the AB, staff, volunteers, or any members of its projects.

Differing viewpoints: CAM publishes articles with differing viewpoints in an effort to nurture vibrant debate and thoughtful critical analysis. Feel free to comment on the articles in the comment section and/or send your letters to the Editors, which we will publish in the Letters column.

Copyrighted Material: This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a not-for-profit charitable organization incorporated in the State of New York, we are making such material available in an effort to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.

Republishing: CovertAction Magazine (CAM) grants permission to cross-post CAM articles on not-for-profit community internet sites as long as the source is acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original CovertAction Magazine article. Also, kindly let us know at info@CovertActionMagazine.com. For publication of CAM articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: info@CovertActionMagazine.com.

By using this site, you agree to these terms above.


About the Author

4 COMMENTS

  1. Kiriakou’s aw shucks corn pone take on everything is predictable and boring. His take on any given subject is limited to/explained by his obvious regret about what he did, but his prescriptions are, more so, worthless. Explaining his own actions as being approved or disapproved of by his mother is utterly vapid. Kiriakou needs to step aside, retire and remain quiet.

  2. As we know, a key part of the US/NATO/Zelensky regime propaganda today is the Russian atrocity story, aimed at mobilising public opinion for the war. Whether true or not, it is certainly marvellous how the Orwellian memory-hole works alright.

    I have a copy of John Rizzo’s autobiography, “Company Man”. In reviewing torture proposals once, Rizzo comments that some “sounded sadistic and terrifying” (p185). There is nothing so moving, eh, as states that pretend to be democratic human rights upholders, tying themselves into contorted knots of hypocrisy?!

Leave a Reply