Graphical user interface

Description automatically generated

Check out Politico’s latest “independent” news story designed to scare the bejeezus out of its readers and justify the cry for more and bigger military hardware contracts to fatten the coffers of our leading weapons makers.

Notice anything new? This pro-war propaganda piece is different because it honestly reveals who bought and paid for it, and who really calls the shots in Politico’s newsroom.

Right on top of this scare piece about Ukraine are the words, “Presented by Lockheed Martin.”

It couldn’t be clearer. Don’t you wish for the same refreshing honesty from all the other media that suckle at the military industrial teat and regurgitate their corporate press releases as if they were genuine independent news reporting?

Since late March, Lockheed had been listed as a sponsor of Politico’s daily national security newsletter—a popular read among Washington’s foreign policy elite. In August, a Lockheed-sponsored article appeared below two advertisements for the F-35 jet that it manufactures.

The most recent Ukraine piecewhich was curiously taken down on Tuesday after Tucker Carlson discussed the article on Fox Newsquoted from a senior House Republican staffer who said: “We’re staring down an Afghanistan-in-Europe type of event with thousands dead, refugee floodgates opened, and U.S.-credibility gutted. It’s going to be horrible to watch.

Horrible for everyone but Lockheed which is a co-producer, with Raytheon, of the Javelin anti-tank missile that the U.S. began supplying to Ukraine beginning in 2018.

Ukraine’s government bought 210 of the missiles and 37 Javelin Command launch units at that time, and then another 150 missiles and 10 launch units in 2020.[1]

Javelin anti-tank missile. [Source:]

In October, the Biden administration sent an additional 30 Javelin anti-tank missiles to Ukraine as tensions with Russia intensified, with more sales likely to be forthcoming.

Ukrainian servicemen launch a missile while testing the U.S. Javelin anti-tank missile system at a shooting range in Ukraine. (file photo)

In a July poll, 50 percent of Americans said they would support “the use of U.S. troops if Russia were to invade the rest of Ukraine,” up from 30 percent in 2014. This indicates that the kind of reporting being advanced by Lockheed in Politico is having an impacteven if it is distorted.

The Truth Does Not Matter

Vice Admiral Kay-Achim Schönbach, the head of the German navy, said that talk of a Russian invasion of Ukraine was “nonsense” and that Russia was merely seeking “respect” for its security concerns in Europe.[2]

A person in a uniform

Description automatically generated with medium confidence
Vice Admiral Kay-Achim Schönbach [Source:]

The U.S. has indeed been provoking Russia for years: Since 2015, the CIA has secretly trained elite Ukrainian Special Forces units in firearms, camouflage techniques, land navigation, tactics like “cover and move,” and intelligence; and the U.S. has given $2.4 billion in “security assistance” since backing a 2014 anti-Russian coup—$450 million in 2021 alone.[3]

Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov gleefully tweeted about a planeload of arms arriving from the U.S. on January 23rd, the second of the weekend. He said: “The second bird in Kyiv! More than 80 tons of weapons to strengthen Ukraine’s defense capabilities from our friends in the USA! And this is not the end.”

Another planeload of arms. [Source:]

None of this was reported in Politico.

When asked about the Lockheed articles, a Politico spokesman responded: “There is a strong firewall between POLITICO’s newsroom and its business teams. As such, POLITICO’s sales team has no influence whatsoever on editorial content and does not share advertiser information with reporters and editors. Decisions about when ad placements appear as part of a sponsorship are fully at the discretion of the advertiser.” The insinuation was that the articles presented by Lockheed were ads although they appeared to the reader to be actual news articles.

Return on its Investment

During the 2020 election cycle, Lockheed provided the Biden campaign with $447,047 (compared to $517,471 to Donald Trump).

It received a major return on its investment when Biden signed off on a 5 percent increase on Trump’s defense budget in December, vowing to spend $768.2 billion next year.

In 2021, Lockheed reported net sales of $67 billion, and its earnings are already up this year.

In June, Lockheed announced that it was prepared to offer Ukraine the F-16 Viper aircraft, which would be in high demand if war with Russia breaks out.

A picture containing text, indoor, office

Description automatically generated

The Finnish Air Force announced last month that it will buy 64 F-35A stealth fighters produced by Lockheed to replace its aging Boeing F/A-18 Hornets amidst rising regional tensions.

Lockheed Martin sees F-35 production rising to 180 units per year, despite  high flying costs | News | Flight Global
Lockheed F-35 stealth fighter. [Source:]

In November, Lockheed concluded a deal to sell 12 S-70 Black Hawk helicopters to Romania.

A picture containing transport, aircraft, helicopter

Description automatically generated
Lockheed S-70 Black Hawk helicopter. [Source:]

It has also done brisk business in Poland—another country on the front lines of the new Cold War—having signed a deal in 2017 to sell it a high-mobility artillery rocket system, guided launch rocket systems, army tactical missile systems and related equipment for $250 million.

Aggressive Lobbying Strategy

Lockheed’s sponsorship of articles in Politico fits an aggressive lobbying strategy going back decades.

During the mid-1990s, the U.S. Committee to Expand NATO was co-founded by Lockheed’s Bruce Jackson, Vice President for Strategy and Planning, who also founded the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, which pushed for the 2003 U.S. invasion.[4]

Now the focal point of Lockheed’s lobbying efforts and fear-mongering is Russia and Ukraine—the topic of a number of articles it has presented in Politico.

One piece in early January was titled “Inside Biden’s secretive weapons shipment to Ukraine.”

It framed secret U.S. arms shipments to Ukraine as necessary in saving Ukraine from peril—the official Biden administration line.

The co-author of the piece, Alex Ward—who also co-wrote the most recent piece warning of a Russian invasion—had been an associate director in the Atlantic Council’s Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security. The Atlantic Council, or “NATO’s de facto think tank,” is financed by Lockheed to the tune of $100,000-$249,999 per year.

Politico | Pulitzer Center
Alex Ward [Source:]

In the fall, Lockheed had “presented” a series of articles in Politico, co-written by Ward, that were critical of Biden’s mishandling of the pullout from Afghanistan.


Politico also ran a puff piece about a secret weapons plant run by Lockheed in the California desert known as “skunk works,” which produced “the U-2 spy plane that could — and still does — collect images from 70,000 feet; the SR-71 Blackbird, an aircraft that could fly at speeds greater than Mach 3; and the F-117 Nighthawk, the first stealth fighter.”

The author of the article, Lee Hudson, wrote that, “for defense tech journalists and aviation nerds,” the special invitation to tour the facility was “the equivalent of a Golden Ticket to Willy Wonka’s factory.” Hudson later conceded, however, that the real purpose of the visit was to “try to kick up support for more Pentagon business amid flat defense budgets.”

Lockheed Martin’s newest Skunk Works facility spans 215,000 square feet in the California desert.
Lockheed “skunk works” facility in the California desert featured in a puff piece in Politico sponsored by Lockheed. [Source:]

Politico was founded in 2007 by two former Washington Post reporters, John F. Harris and Jim VandeHei, to focus on politics with fast-paced internet reporting.

Since then, it has grown significantly and maintained a good reputation—making its evolution into a propaganda organ for a leading death merchant particularly disturbing.

  1. Joe Biden himself had earlier pushed for provision of Javelin missiles during the Obama presidency.

  2. Schönbach was forced to resign after making these remarks.

  3. Last week, the Biden administration approved an additional $200 million in military aid that includes maritime equipment and radar systems.

  4. See Andrew Cockburn, The Spoils of War (London: Verso, 2021), 80. For a history of Lockheed and war profiteering, see William D. Hartung, Profits of War: Lockheed Martin and the Making of the Military-Industrial Complex (New York: The Nation Books, 2011).

CovertAction Magazine is made possible by subscriptionsorders and donations from readers like you.

Blow the Whistle on U.S. Imperialism

Click the whistle and donate

When you donate to CovertAction Magazine, you are supporting investigative journalism. Your contributions go directly to supporting the development, production, editing, and dissemination of the Magazine.

CovertAction Magazine does not receive corporate or government sponsorship. Yet, we hold a steadfast commitment to providing compensation for writers, editorial and technical support. Your support helps facilitate this compensation as well as increase the caliber of this work.

Please make a donation by clicking on the donate logo above and enter the amount and your credit or debit card information.

CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and your gift is tax-deductible for federal income purposes. CAI’s tax-exempt ID number is 87-2461683.

We sincerely thank you for your support.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s). CovertAction Institute, Inc. (CAI), including its Board of Directors (BD), Editorial Board (EB), Advisory Board (AB), staff, volunteers and its projects (including CovertAction Magazine) are not responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. This article also does not necessarily represent the views the BD, the EB, the AB, staff, volunteers, or any members of its projects.

Differing viewpoints: CAM publishes articles with differing viewpoints in an effort to nurture vibrant debate and thoughtful critical analysis. Feel free to comment on the articles in the comment section and/or send your letters to the Editors, which we will publish in the Letters column.

Copyrighted Material: This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. As a not-for-profit charitable organization incorporated in the State of New York, we are making such material available in an effort to advance the understanding of humanity’s problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. You can read more about ‘fair use’ and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.

Republishing: CovertAction Magazine (CAM) grants permission to cross-post CAM articles on not-for-profit community internet sites as long as the source is acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original CovertAction Magazine article. Also, kindly let us know at For publication of CAM articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:

By using this site, you agree to these terms above.

About the Author


  1. Politico has no option. They are finance by the War Industry. Also, in order for Americans to find the war more palatable, war think tanks and their Corporate Media partners have to blame Russia for kicking the ball first. Little do the gullible masses suspect who shoots the first shot to trigger the war is arranged, agreed in advance by the War Game players. They even arrange the exact date and exact time. They must may sure all sides are ready, as well as TV cameras, for a live show.

    DISGUSTING!!!! but inevitable due to people accepting militarist, Armed Forces and the War industry.

Leave a Reply